Mitsubishi International Corporation v. Cardinal Textile Sales Inc’s Empirical Analysis
14 F.3d 1507 · 1994
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc. (2004), Hilao v. Estate of Marcos (1994)
23 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Sampson v. Murray · Carson v. American Brands, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the general federal rule of equity is that a court may not reach a defendant's assets unrelated to the underlying litigation and freeze them so that they may be preserved to satisfy a potential money judgment.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]here the state attachment statute does not authorize prejudgment attachment in a given case, a district court is not authorized ... to attempt to accomplish the same result by issuing a preliminary injunction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“are available under the circumstances and in the manner provided by the law of the state in which the district court is held.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.