Skandalis v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2019
5 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Udall v. Tallman · Harris v. McRae · United States v. Larionoff · Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An agency's interpretation of a statute that the agency administers is entitled to considerable deference.... When an agency construes its own regulations, such deference is particularly appropriate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'we must defer to the agency's resolution of the matter if it is based on a permissible construction of the statute and is sufficiently reasonable.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“particular groups of people for whom such care would be cheaper than the institutionalization care they would otherwise need.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.