Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 F.3d 256 - Burt v. Ware

Burt v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

14 F.3d 256 · 1994

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Wallis v. Jr Simplot Company (1994), Ogden v. San Juan County (1994)

49 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

530199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2074 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co. · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hat the foregoing amendments ... shall govern all proceedings in appellate cases ... commenced [after the effective date of the amendments] and, insofar as just and practicable, all proceedings in appellate cases then pending.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A notice of appeal filed after announcement or entry of the judgment but before disposition of any of the above motions is ineffective to appeal from the judgment or order ... until the date of the entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Under amended Rule 3(d), the district court is required to send a copy of any later docket entry in [plaintiff's] case to the court of appeals. Those docket entries will serve to advise this court of the date on which [plaintiff's] notice of appeal becomes effective.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re: Ross · Ross

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.