Shabazz v. Askins’s Empirical Analysis
14 F.3d 533 · 1994
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Rucks v. Boergermann (1995), Marshall v. Columbia Lea Regional Hospital (2003)
16 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Applied Genetics International, Inc. v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc. · Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. Sales · Brown v. Sales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.