Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 F.3d 594

Docket No. 93-7210.

Davis v. Smith

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided Jan. 24, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 1994 · most notably Cooke v. Sr Witkowski (1993), Fairfax Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board, District of Columbia Nurses Association, Respondent-Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Fairfax Hospital (1993)

31 federal appellate ·

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Wallace S. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA; Ira C. Wolpert, Foley & Lardner, Washington, D.C.; James LeRoy Banks, Jr., Christian, Barton, Epps, Brent & Chappell, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his claims for civil rights violations, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988), and copyright infringement, 17 U.S.C.A. Sec. 501 (West 1977 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Smith, No. CA-91-747-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/14/f3d/594 · .json · Public domain