Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 F.3d 597

Docket No. 93-7093.

United States v. Locklear

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided Jan. 18, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-01-18

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Arcia

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-01-18

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-92-42-3, CA-93-10-3-H)

Ronald Dean Locklear, appellant pro se.

Christine Witcover Dean, Asst. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Locklear, Nos. CR-92-42-3; CA-93-10-3-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/14/f3d/597 · .json · Public domain