Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 F.3d 956 - Smith v. Dixon

Smith v. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis

14 F.3d 956 · 1994

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Rose v. Lee (2001), Coe v. Bell (1998)

57 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

850199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Coleman v. Thompson · Gregg v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[u]pon a previous appeal the defendant was in a position to adequately raise the ground or issue underlying the present motion but did not do so”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[O]nly constitutional harmless-error analysis or reweighing at the trial level suffices to guarantee that the defendant received an individualized sentence. Where the death sentence has been infected by a vague or otherwise constitutionally invalid aggravating factor, the state appellate court or some other state sentencer must actually perform a new sentencing calculus, if the sentence is to stand”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.