Brady Development Company Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Lewis Fsb v. W (2005), 22 Cal. App. 4th 1769 - Robbins v. Foothill Nissan (1994)
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marquis v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Meliezer v. Resolution Trust Co. · Resolution Trust Corporation v. Mustang Partners · Circle Industries, Division of Nastasi-White, Inc. v. City Federal Savings Bank · 737 F. Supp. 18 - Tuxedo Beach Club Corp. v. City Federal Savings Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“permit creditors to evade the comprehensive administrative claims procedures envisioned by the statute.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage““To effectuate its goals of managing claims in an expeditious and efficient manner through an administrative process, Congress placed jurisdictional limits on the power of the federal courts to review matters involving failed savings and loans under FIRREA. Congress sought to ensure that all claims undergo the administrative claims process and are under the exclusive control of the RTC. To this end, section 1821(d)(13)(D) provides: Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no court shall have jurisdiction over— (i) any claim or action for payment from, or any action seeking a determination of rights with respect to, the assets of any depository institution for which the Corporation has been appointed receiver, including assets which the Corporation may acquire from itself as such receiver; or (ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the Corporation as receiver.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(i) any claim or action for payment from, or any action seeking a determination of rights with respect to, the assets of any depository institution for which the [FDIC] has been appointed receiver, including assets which the [FDIC] may acquire from itself as such receiver; or (ii) any claim relating to any act or omission of such institution or the [FDIC] as receiver.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.