United States v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Ornelas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“our task is not to perform a 'divide-and-conquer analysis'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“No simple, mechanical formula tells us what reasonable suspicion is, though we know that it is less than probable cause and more than a naked hunch. . . . [C]ourts must gauge its presence in a commonsense, case-by-case way, taking in the whole picture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a seizure is 'justified only by a police-observed traffic violation,' officers may not prolong a stop [to investigate another crime] 'absent the reasonable suspicion ordinarily demanded to justify detaining an individual.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.