Friedman v. Friedman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[The Deposited Assets Class] claims are based on well-established legal principles, have the ability of being proved with concrete documentation, and are readily valuated in terms of time and inflation. By contrast, the claims of the other four classes are based on novel and untested legal theories of liability, would have been very difficult to prove at trial, and will be very difficult to accurately valuate.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 302 F. Supp. 2d 89 - In Re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation

2. “), which shares many class members with the present litigation. The efficacy of having one organization process the claims of individuals entitled to recover from both programs cannot be gainsaid. Friedman argues that the district court might just as easily have chosen the International Organization on Migration (the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re: Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation

3. “class. While we find that their claim lacks legal merit, we note that counsel for the plaintiffs-appellees has indicated in the context of an unrelated appeal that members of the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re: Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation