Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 F. App'x 225

Johns v. Baskerville

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-07-20

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2001-07-20

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Joshua Bernard Johns seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Johns’ motion for a writ of habeas corpus, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Johns v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-58-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/14/fappx/225 · .json · Public domain