Kethley v. Berge’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lindh v. Murphy · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · United States v. Locke · Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o court has found that the running of the limitation period also is tolled ... for the time period during which a properly filed application for post-conviction or other collateral review is pending in federal court”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“time is not tolled [under section 2244(d)(2)] while an improperly filed federal habeas petition is gathering dust on district court shelves”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the procedural dismissal of petitioner's action in the present case should not later be construed to produce the unintended effect of barring federal habeas review under the AEDPA statute of limitations provision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.