14 F. Supp. 2d 1203 - Conley v. Crabtree’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2017
8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Bailey v. United States · Bousley v. United States · McCleskey v. Zant · Muscarello v. United States · Young v. Higbee Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) where newly discovered evidence exists which would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; (2) where there is a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; (3) where a subsequent court decision alters the prevailing interpretation of a statute and makes clear that the petitioner’s conduct did not violate the statute, hence the conviction must be vacated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.