Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 F. Supp. 2d 978 - Streber v. Hunter

14 F. Supp. 2d 978 - Streber v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 2000
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Behrens v. Pelletier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the needs of the interstate and international systems; (2) the relevant policies of the forum; (3) the relevant policies of other interested states and the relative interests of those states; (4) the protection of justified expectations; (5) the basic policies underlying the particular field of law; (6) certainty, predictability and uniformity of result; (7) ease in the determination and application of the law to be applied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Streber v. Hunter
  2. “directly contradicts Texas precedent protecting the rights of Texas clientsand arguably violated the Open Courts provisions [of the Texas and Louisiana constitutions] by divesting an individual of a cause of action before he or she had reason to know it existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Tracy Parker Streber
  3. “[t]he relationship cannot be said to be 'centered' either exclusively in Louisiana and Texas, since numerous contacts occurred in both states and both states have significant connections to the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Tracy Parker Streber

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.