Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Ill. 167

Abrams v. Lee

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1852

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1852-12-15

This was an action of account, under the statute, between copartners. The cause was heard in this court, upon errors assigned by both parties, as will be seen by reference to twelfth Illinois Reports, p. 111.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1927

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1852-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Treat, C. J.

¶1The decision of the circuit court was clearly right. The case was already res adjudicóla. It was submitted to this court at a former term, in pursuance of a stipulation of the parties, that cross errors might be assigned on the record, and that such judgment might be entered here as the circuit court should have rendered. This court then came to the conclusion, on a thorough review of the whole case, that the circuit court erred in not rendering judgment for the defendant in bar of the action, and final judgment was thereupon entered here in his favor. Lee v. Abrams, 12 Illinois, 111. That was a full and final determination of the case. It was not open to any. further proceeding in the circuit court.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/14/ill/167 · .json · Public domain