14 Ill. 2d 566 - Hanley v. Hanley’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 216 Ill. 2d 602 - Gunn v. Sobucki (2005), 108 Ill. App. 3d 16 - Zack Co. v. Sims (1982)
5 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 13 Ill. 2d 200 - Ariola v. Nigro · Ridgely v. Central Pipe Line Co. · 6 Ill. 2d 224 - Scanlon v. Scanlon · Baker v. Baker · Bremer v. Bremer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]cts of the alleged trustee or equitable owner subsequent to the taking of title have no bearing upon the question of whether a resulting trust was raised,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if at all, at the instant legal title is taken and vests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the evidence must be clear, convincing and unmistakable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Magill v. Comm'r
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.