Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 ILLAPP3D 856 - Russell v. Klein

Russell v. Klein’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1977
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Louis E. Bower, Inc. v. Silverstein · American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad · 16 Ill. App. 2d 240 - Stoecklin v. Paulos · Handley v. Moburg · 40 Ill. 2d 186 - AMER. NAT. BK. & TRUST v. Penn. RR Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) Relief from final orders, judgments and decrees, after 30 days from the entry thereof, may be had upon petition as provided in this section. Writs of error coram nobis and coram vobis, writs of audita querela, bills of review and bills in the nature of bills of review are abolished. All relief heretofore obtainable and the grounds for said relief heretofore available, either at law or in equity, whether by any of the foregoing remedies or otherwise, shall be available in every case, by proceedings hereunder, regardless of the nature of the order, judgment or decree from which relief is sought or of the proceedings in which it was entered. There shall be no distinction among actions at law, suits in equity and other proceedings, statutory or otherwise, as to availability of relief, grounds for relief or the relief obtainable. * * * (3) The petition must be filed not later than 2 years after the entry of the order, judgment or decree. Time during which the person seeking relief is under legal disability or duress or the ground for relief is fraudulently concealed shall be excluded in computing the period of 2 years.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.