Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Ind. 185

State v. Horsey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1860

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1860-05-31

<p>APPEAL from the Martin Court of Common Pleas.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1860-05-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1908

3 state decisions

1018601870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hanna, J.

¶1This was an information for failing to return a marriage certificate within the time required by statute. 1 E. S. p. 362.—2 id. 441. The information was, on motion of the defendant, quashed. The state excepted and appealed.

¶2The information was sufficient. The section of the statute referred to in the second volume, being of a later date than that contained in the first volume, repealed that portion of the last-named statute fixing the penalty. The penalty fixed in the first volume was 5 dollars for each month that the failure should continue; by the statute of a later date, a person who fails to make the return, within the time fixed by law, subjects himself to a fine of not less than 5 nor more than 100 dollars. These sections cannot be reconciled, and the latter repeals the'former by duplication. It was not, therefore, necessary to aver that one *186month had elapsed, after the time within which the return should have been made.

J. E. McDonald, Attorney General, and A. L. Roache, for the state.per Curiam.

¶3The judgment is reversed with costs., Cause remanded, &c.

/14/ind/185 · .json · Public domain