Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Ind. 419

Cline v. Inlow

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1860

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1860-06-08

<p>APPEAL from the Montgomery Circuit Court.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1886

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1860-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hanna, J.

¶1Suit on notes and to foreclose a mortgage.

¶2Answer, that the mortgage had not been recorded within ninety days, and that afterwards the defendant sold said lands to one Brown in good faith and for a valuable consideration, who was in possession and was a necessary party, &c.

¶3Demurrer to the answer sustained.

¶4The answer was not sufficient. If it had been sufficient to prevent a foreclosure, it was not a valid defense against a recovery of judgment on the notes, and would, therefore, be bad, having been pleaded in answer to the whole complaint. But it was not an answer to the prayer for a foreclosure. If Brown had any rights, distinct from those of the defendant, they would not be concluded by a proceeding to which he was not a party. He was not, therefore, a necessary party; whether a proper party upon his own application, we need not decide.

$. c. Willson and J. E. McDonald, for the appellant.jper Curiam.

¶5The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

/14/ind/419 · .json · Public domain