Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Ind. 571

Young v. Moody

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1860

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1860-08-23

Davis, Moody Sp Co. brought suit on a promissory note against Young and another, filing a formal complaint. The record further shows that “ Hopkins, an attorney of this Court, comes and files an affidavit and warrant to confess judgment in this behalf, which reads as follows, to-wit.” The power of attorney, with the affidavit required by the statute, is then set out in the record, and is in all respects perfect.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1907

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1860-08-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The defendant made no exception—took no steps whatever to have the error, if there were any, corrected or brought to the attention of the Court in any way. No motion for a new trial, or to correct error. The record presents no question.

-Lee and G. W. Spitler, for the appellants.J. E. McDonald and A. L. Roadie, for the appellees.Per Curiam.

¶2The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

/14/ind/571 · .json · Public domain