Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 INDAPP 27 - Tegarden v. Phillips

Tegarden v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
6
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2016

16 state decisions

201895190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shugart v. Miles · Dearmond v. Dearmond · Montgomery v. Vickery · Edwards v. Russell · Burns v. Gavin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The degree of relationship by affinity is found by counting up to the common ancestor ... and then counting down.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Affinity is the tie which exists between one of the spouses with the kindred of the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.