Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Johns. 357

Fuller v. Mattice

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1817

New York Supreme Court · decided 1817-10-15

IN ERROR, on certiorari to a iustice’s court. The defendant m error brought an action against plain- ° ° t l tiff in error, the defendant in the court below, for his services as a witness in a foreign county ; and it appeared, at the trial, that the plaintiff below was subpoenaed, from the county of Schoharie, to attend a trial at a justice’s court, in the county of Greene; that he was absent three days, and had received 75 cents. justice gave judgment for the plaintiff, for…

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1860

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1817-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The only question in this case .is, whether a witness, who is subpoenaed to attend a trial, in a justice’s court, is entitled to recover from the party subpoenaing him, any thing for his expenses beyond the 25 cents, allowed by the The act (I JY. R. L. 339.) declares, that no greater or other costs shall be allowed or taken in actions brought by virtue of that act, than is therein mentioned ; and, among other things, foreign witnesses attending and sworn, are allowed 25 cents per day. The act, relative to the fees of witnesses, attending in •courts of record, within this state, is a little more explicit, and *360declares that the witness shall be entitled to receive, as a compensation for his attendance and expenses, the daily allowance specified in the fee bill, (1 R. L. 5~24.) The construction which has always been given to the last.~nentioned act is, that nothing beyond such allowance could be claimed; and we think, that the same construction must be given to the provision for witnesses in the act in question. The judgment must, accordingly, be reversed.

¶2Judgment reversed.

/14/johns/357 · .json · Public domain