Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Kan. App. 2d 274 - Read v. Miller

14 Kan. App. 2d 274 - Read v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · In re Jantz · Kansas State Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. Goertzen · Szoboszlay v. Glessner · State v. Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Szoboszlay v. Glessner, 233 Kan. 475, 479 , 664 P.2d 1327 (1983). We applied this rule to a similar question in Stanton v. KCC, 2 Kan. App.2d 228 , 577 P.2d 367 , rev. denied 225 Kan. 845 (1978). The appellants filed a notice of appeal out of time along with an application to the trial court for an extension of time based on excusable neglect. The trial court granted permission to file the appeal out of time. 2 Kan. App.2d at 229 . This court dismissed, explaining:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Bank v. Heslet, 84 Kan. 315, 317 , 113 Pac. 1052 (1911) (citing Webster's New International Dictionary). When 90 days expire with no extension, there is nothing left to extend, or stretch out. This accords both with the natural meaning of the words”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"2. The plaintiff believed defendant resided in Wyandotte County, Kansas. However, it has been determined that the defendant resides in Leavenworth County, Kansas. "3. An Alias Summons has been issued to the Sheriff of Leavenworth County, Kansas."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.