14 Kan. App. 2d 286 - State v. Heigele’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · State v. Jackson · State v. Ruden · Penachio v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). The Supreme Court has noted that a district judge may exercise discretion to re-entertain a motion to suppress evidence previously ruled on by another judge in the same case. State v. Riedel, 242 Kan. 834, 838 , 752 P.2d 115 (1988); State v. Jackson, 213 Kan. 219, 226 , 515 P.2d 1108 (1973); State v. Olson, 11 Kan. App. 2d 485, 488 , 726 P.2d 1347 , rev. denied 240 Kan. 805 (1986). And the Court of Appeals has held that a district judge has”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.