Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Kan. App. 2d 591 - State v. Evans

14 Kan. App. 2d 591 - State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2018

12 state decisions

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Simopoulos v. Virginia · Economic Research Analysts, Inc. v. O'Connell · Malone v. United States · United States v. Terrigno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Kansas Constitution contains a strong prohibition against religious coercion. We are persuaded that the standards set in the Wright case ought to be applied in Evans’ case and that ‘only those interests of the highest order’ ought to override the free exercise of religion. Lacking a showing of an interest of the highest order, we reverse and remand for resentencing before another judge.” 14 Kan. App. 2d at 593 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"[C]ertain conditions of probation may restrict constitutional rights or freedoms an ordinary citizen might enjoy. However, any such restrictions must bear a reasonable relationship to the rehabilitative goals of probation, the protection of the public, and the nature of the offense. See United States v. Terrigno , 838 F.2d 371 , 374 (9th Cir. 1988)." State v. Evans , 14 Kan. App. 2d 591 , 592, 796 P.2d 178 (1990).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.