Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Mass. 207

Ex Parte Leighton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1817-06-15

The said Leighton was brought from the prison of the county, upon a writ of habeas corpus, on which the keeper of the prison had returned that he was committed on an execution issued upon a judgment against him in a civil action, a copy of which accompanied his return.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1817-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1891

8 state decisions

20181718201830184018501860187018801890decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

The Court,

¶1after looking into the statute, and the case of Thachen & Al. vs. Dinsmore, (1) held the return sufficient, and Leighton was remanded to prison.

¶25 Mass. Rep. 299.

/14/mass/207 · .json · Public domain