White v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
98 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently November 1984 · most notably McBee v. State (1963), Hunter v. State (1969)
98 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Rabinowitz · Anderson v. State · Turner v. State · Elliott Et Ux. v. State · 8 Smith & H. 370 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`The substance of these provisions is that an officer may lawfully proceed to arrest without a warrant any person when the officer has, with reasonable cause, been led to believe that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony. It is essential to the protection of society that a wide discretion be vested in officers chosen to enforce our laws against felonies. It is impossible to define "reasonable cause" in terms to fit all cases arising. Each case must stand on its own facts. A narrow construction would open the way for the escape of desperate criminals and the defeat of justice. One too liberal would lead to the harassment of the innocent. But the officer may not be required to wait for assurance, for evidence which would convict; when circumstances fairly point to a felony it is his duty to act, and act promptly.'"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jefferson““It is a well-settled rule that this Court will not reverse a criminal case on the facts unless it is shown that the evidence preponderates against the verdict and in favor of the innocence of the accused. “The verdict of the jury, approved by the Trial Judge, accredited the testimony of the witnesses for the State, and established their credibility. Such verdict also displaced the presumption of defendants’ innocence, raised a presumption of their guilt, and put upon them here the burden of showing that the evidence preponderates against the verdict and in favor of their innocence.” White v. State, 210 Tenn. 78, 84-85 , 356 S.W.2d 411, 414 (1962).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thompson““It is thoroughly settled, under our practice, that objectionable argument or im proper remarks of counsel afford no ground for a new trial, where no objection is made or exception taken at the time of the argument, (citing cases).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rye v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.