Volume 14 — Maryland Appellate Reports

PATERNITY PROCEEDINGS — EVIDENCE — <italic>Evidence Establishing That</italic><italic>Husband And Wife Were Living Separate And Apart Held Sufficient</italic><italic>To Warrant Introduction Of Wife's Testimony As To Nonaccess By</italic><italic>Husband To Rebut Usual Presumption That Husband Is Father Of</italic><italic>Wife's Child</italic>. p. 96 PATERNITY PROCEEDINGS — <italic>Limitations Of Actions — Where</italic><italic>Statute Provides For Proceedings To Establish Paternity Be</italic><italic>Commenced Within Two Years From Date Putative Father Makes</italic><italic>Payment For Support Or Provisions For Maintenance Of Child,</italic><italic>Statute Is Tolled If Last Contribution Toward Support And</italic><italic>Maintenance Is Within Two Years Of Birth Of Child — Payment Of</italic><italic>Any Money For Support Or Any Material Contribution Held</italic><italic>Sufficient Under Statute — Statute Of Limitations Tolled By</italic><italic>Single Payment Or Furnishing Of Support Or Maintenance Only Where</italic><italic>There Is Other Proof Sufficient To Establish Paternity</italic>. pp. 98-99 PATERNITY PROCEEDINGS — <italic>Self-Incrimination — Statutory</italic><italic>Privilege Not To Give Incriminating Evidence Under Article</italic><italic>16, § 66F(b) Should Be Claimed Prior To Responding To</italic><italic>Propounded Interrogatory — Answer To Interrogatory</italic><italic>Incriminating Putative Father And Admitted In Evidence At Trial</italic><italic>Held To Be Harmless Error</italic>. p. 99 H.E.F.

SEARCHES AND SEIZURES — <italic>Sufficiency Of Probable Cause To</italic><italic>Justify Issuance Of Search Warrant — Hearsay Information —</italic><italic>Issuance Of Warrant Based On "Two-Pronged Test" Held</italic><italic>Sufficient Where There Was (1) Minute Particularity Of</italic><italic>Circumstances Surrounding The Purchase Of Drugs By Informant, (2)</italic><italic>Statement By Informant That Constituted A Declaration Against</italic><italic>Penal Interest And (3) Sufficient Underlying Circumstances</italic><italic>Establishing Previous Reliability Of Informant — Information By</italic><italic>Informant Corroborated By Independent Investigation Of Affiant</italic><italic>Held To Constitute Sufficient Probable Cause For Issuance Of</italic><italic>Search Warrant</italic>. pp. 123-124, 127-128 H.E.F.