Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Md. App. 385 - King v. State

14 Md. App. 385 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2008 · most notably 31 Md. App. 604 - Isaacs v. State (1976), 14 Md. App. 689 - James v. State (1972)

26 state decisions

1101972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Laverick v. United States · 5 Md. App. 450 - Williams v. State · 9 Md. App. 15 - Metz v. State · Madison v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . Circumstantial evidence alone is sufficient to support a verdict of guilty (except for the crime of treason and, in some jurisdictions, perjury) or it may be used in conjunction with direct evidence. It may corroborate other testimony and may be used to prove any element of the crime, such as the corpus delicti or the criminal agency of the accused. The law makes no distinction between direct evidence of a fact and evidence of circumstances from which the existence of a fact may be inferred. No greater degree of certainty is required when the evidence is circumstantial than when it is direct, for in either case the trier of fact must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused.” (Footnote omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.