Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Md. App. 395 - Sun Cab Co. v. Carter

14 Md. App. 395 - Sun Cab Co. v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2019

18 state decisions

12019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. State · Wilhelm v. State of Maryland Traffic Safety Commission · Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co. · Snowhite v. State, Use of Tennant · Kucharczyk v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As pointed out in Hughes v. Carter, 236 Md. 484, 486 , citing Charlton Bros. v. Garretson, 188 Md. 85, 94 , although the law requires proof of probable, not merely possible facts, including causal relations, ‘* * * sequence of events, plus proof of possible causal relations, may amount to proof of probable causal relations, in the absence of evidence of any other equally probable cause.’” [Emphasis added]. Id. at 408.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““In so far as the contention goes to the competency of Carter to testify, this was a matter in the discretion of the trial court. It had the opportunity to observe Carter on the stand and had knowledge of the explanations given by him. We cannot say that the receipt of his testimony was an abuse of judicial discretion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.