14 Md. App. 582 - State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2001 · most notably Epps v. State (1975), State v. Gee (1984)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3282
Relies on United States v. Marion · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Ewell · Toussie v. United States · Pollard v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[I]t is either a formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding to answer a criminal charge that engage the particular protections of the speedy trial provision of the Sixth Amendment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Actual prejudice to the defense of a criminal case may result from the shortest and most necessary delay; and no one suggests that every delay-caused detriment to a defendant’s case should abort a criminal prosecution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The length of the delay, (2) The reason for the delay, (3) Prejudice to the accused, and (4) Waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.