Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 N.C. App. 110 - State v. Dees

14 N.C. App. 110 - State v. Dees’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably 471 So. 2d 497 - Hubbard v. State (1985), 45 N.C. App. 297 - State v. Stafford (1980)

32 state decisions

16019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Smith · State v. Kimrey · 10 N.C. App. 56 - State v. Byrd · 8 N.C. App. 532 - State v. Jenkins · State v. Summers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]n the case of common articles having a market value, the courts have usually rejected the original cost and any special value to the owner personally as standards of value for purposes of graduation of the offense, and have declared the proper criterion to be the price which the subject of the larceny would bring in open market — its ‘market value’ or its ‘reasonable selling price’, at the time and place of the theft, and in the condition in which it was when the thief commenced the acts culminating in the larceny .... It has been ruled that the actual value of the thing wrongfully appropriated, rather than the intention of the taker with respect to value, determines the grade of larceny.” 50 Am. Jur. 2d, Larceny, § 45, pp. 209-211 (1970) (footnotes omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.