14 N.C. App. 120 - State v. Hart’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
September 1983
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. . Oxendine · State v. . Miller · State v. . Stroud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[GJuilty knowledge need not be shown by direct proof of actual knowledge, as by proof that defendant witnessed the theft, or that such theft was acknowledged to him by the person from whom he received the goods; rather, such knowledge may be implied by evidence of circumstances surrounding the receipt of the goods. [Citation omitted.] The test is whether defendant knew, or must have known, that the goods were stolen. [Citation omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bizzell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.