14 N.C. App. 361 - State v. Lindquist’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1981
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson · State v. Harvey · State v. Vestal · State v. Colson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The offenses are designated in the statute separately and while the jury would have been fully justified in finding the defendant guilty on both counts under the evidence in this case, their failure to do so does not as a matter of law vitiate the verdict on the count of transporting. It goes without saying that the jury would have to find from the circumstantial evidence that defendant had in his possession liquors that he was transporting before they could convict him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.