14 Neb. Ct. App. 684 - State v. Head’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jacques · State v. Hurbenca · State v. Neiss · US Ecology, Inc. v. State · Wilcox v. City of McCook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]ntil a defendant's guilt or innocence of the underlying DUI has been determined, the admissibility of prior DUI convictions for enhancement purposes is not yet ripe for determination by the court. Consequently, a motion to quash which raises the issue of the admissibility of a defendant's prior DUI convictions, for enhancement purposes, should not be filed until after a determination of the defendant's guilt on the underlying offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.