Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 N.J. Misc. 795 - McCarthy v. Guire

14 N.J. Misc. 795 - McCarthy v. Guire’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1954
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schmid v. Stanton Forging Co. · Hanover Trust Co. v. Rizzo · Schwenk v. DeMaio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Obviously, there can be no fixed formula by which the necessary element of surprise may be measured in every case. The extenuating factors of each particular situation must be the ultimate determinants. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.