14 N.J. Super. 116 - Labash v. Mancini’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2009
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Paradiso v. Mazejy · Doctorman v. Schroeder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is the aim of a court of equity, wherever possible, to relieve a purchaser from the forfeiture of his right to purchase property as a result of his failure to comply strictly with the terms of the contract. If the failure to comply is not deliberate or flagrant and there are no overriding equities, a court of equity will grant relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Many attempts were made to persuade the defendants to go through with the sale but they refused. They had decided that they could get a higher price.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“regretted their bargain and sought to relieve themselves of its burden.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.