Eagle Mining and Improvement Co. v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
1907
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1993
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gold-Mining Company v. National Bank · Urann v. Coates · Bahnsen v. Gilbert · Armijo v. Abeytia · Warner v. Foote
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The difference between an express and a resulting trust is that the latter results or arises from circumstances which may be proved by any legal evidence, verbal or written; while the former is created by agreement not necessarily made in writing, but which must be manifested or proved by writing.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McDermott v. Sher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.