14 Ohio App. 2d 55 - State v. Allison’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1976
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Head · State v. Viegel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Probation After Serving Sentence. Subject to R. C. 2951.03 to 2951.09, inclusive, the trial court may, upon motion of the defendant made not earlier than thirty days nor later than sixty days after the defendant, having been sentenced, is delivered into the custody of the keeper of the institution in which he is to begin serving his sentence, or upon the court’s own motion during the same thirty-day period, suspend the further execution of the sentence and place the defendant on probation upon such terms as the court determines, notwithstanding the expiration of the term of court during which such defendant was sentenced.. “If a hearing is deemed necessary by the trial court in the determination of a motion for suspension of further execution of sentence and for probation made pursuant to E. Q. 2947.061, the court shall hold the hearing within sixty days after the filmg date of the motion a/nd enter its ruling thereon within ten days of the hearing. If no hearing is conducted on such motion the court shall enter its ruling thereon within seventy days of the filing of the motion.” (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.