Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Ohio App. 3d 10 - State v. Stadler

14 Ohio App. 3d 10 - State v. Stadler’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2015

17 state decisions

601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Pepper Pike v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial court should use a balancing test, which weighs the interest of the accused in his good name and right to be free from unwarranted punishment against the legitimate need of government to maintain records.” Id. at 377, 20 O.O.3d at 336 , 421 N.E.2d at 1306 . Accord State v. Stadler, supra, 14 Ohio App.3d at 11 , 14 OBR at 14, 469 N.E.2d at 913 (petitioner’s right to privacy weighed against government’s interest to maintain record of criminal proceedings).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “limited to the rare case where the accused can demonstrate unusual and exceptional circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.