Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Ohio App. 3d 120 - Jones v. Honchell

14 Ohio App. 3d 120 - Jones v. Honchell’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably 130 Ohio App. 3d 746 - Griffith v. Linton (1998), 79 Ohio App. 3d 126 - Rock v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1992)

36 state decisions

11019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · 69 Ohio App. 2d 111 - Mills v. Jaguar-Cleveland · First Nat. Bank of Akron v. Cann · 54 Ohio App. 2d 153 - Standard Roofing Co. v. John G. Johnson & Sons Construction Co. · First National Bank v. Cann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Plaintiff's] waiver of the arbitration provision may be inferred from the filing of the instant suit in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas in lieu of pursuing arbitration. [Defendant] did not raise the arbitration provision of the contract in his answer, which may also be construed to be a waiver of the clause. Had [defendant] elected to force the dispute into arbitration, he need only have asserted the arbitration clause in his answer and made a motion to stay the trial per R.C. 2711.02 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.