14 Ohio App. 3d 3 - Ware v. Richey’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2005 · most notably Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc. (1989), 21 Ohio App. 3d 208 - Mills v. City of Dayton (1985)
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Bruni v. Tatsumi · Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland · Hoskins v. Aetna Life Insurance · Riley v. City of Cincinnati
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n order to prevail on a claim for lack of informed consent, medical expert testimony is necessary to establish the significant risks which would have been disclosed to support the plaintiff's claim since the probability and magnitude of those risks is a matter of medical judgment beyond the knowledge of the lay person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““A party has not ‘failed to make a good faith effort to settle’ under R.C. 1343.03(C) if he has (1) fully cooperated in discovery proceedings, (2) rationally evaluated his risks and potential liability, (3) not attempted to unnecessarily delay any of the proceedings, and (4) made a good faith monetary settlement offer or responded in good faith to an offer from the other party. If a party has a good faith, objectively reasonable belief that he has no liability, he need not make a monetary settlement offer.” Kalain, supra, at syllabus (holding award of prejudgment interest an abuse of discretion).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In order for patient to prevail on claim for lack of informed consent, patient must show: an unrevealed risk which should have been made known materialized; unrevealed risk was harmful to patient; and disclosure of the significant risks incidental to the treatment would have resulted in patient's decision against treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.