14 Ohio App. 3d 69 - State v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2019
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld · Rinaldi v. Yeager · James v. Strange · State v. Sinito · Schneider v. Laffoon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if a parent charged with a support obligation fails to support his or her children, they become in danger of needing state assistance. Placing the child in that 'danger' can form the basis for the criminal charge under R.C. 2919.21. * * * The legislature may discourage such offensive conduct by punitive legislation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parr“'[t]he parent's duty of support also runs to the state. It is the duty of the state which has been codified by R.C. 2919.21, making the failure to provide adequate support a misdemeanor of the first degree.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parr“the burden of showing the unconstitutionality of a statute is upon the one challenging its validity and it must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.