14 Ohio App. 3d 78 - State v. Staten’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Iacona (2001), State v. Young (2021)
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Berger v. United States · State v. Dehass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he prosecutor, as an agent of the state, has a constitutional duty to assure the defendant a fair trial. Consistent therewith is the obligation of the prosecutor (1) to refrain from knowingly using perjured testimony, (2) to disclose certain evidence favorable to the accused, and (3) to correct testimony he knows to be false.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Spaulding“* * * if there is any reasonable likelihood that the incorrect and misleading testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Steen“was privy to knowledge that the testimony [of the witness] was both incorrect and misleading.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.