Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 OHIOST3D 13 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

1,501
cited by 1,501 later decisions
3
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1,482 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,501 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Lott (1990), State v. Maurer (1984)

7 federal appellate · 1,482 state decisions

556019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · United States v. Hasting · 6 Ohio St. 2d 14 - State v. Woodards · Kerestes v. United States · State v. Liberatore

Cited together with Strickland v. Washington · Smith v. Phillips · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · State v. Lott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,501 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether remarks were improper and, if so, whether they prejudicially affected substantial rights of the accused.”
    114 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he touchstone of analysis `is the fairness of the trial, not the culpability of the prosecutor.' This court will not deem a trial unfair if, in the context of the entire trial, it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the jury would have found the defendant guilty even without the improper comments.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'A conviction will be reversed only where it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that, absent the prosecutor's comments, the jury would not have found appellant guilty.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.