Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 OHIOST3D 58 - Johnson v. Porter

Johnson v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 44 Ohio App. 3d 161 - Testa v. Roberts (1988), 61 Ohio App. 3d 397 - Bobko v. Sagen (1989)

26 state decisions

9019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 2 Ohio App. 3d 300 - Bilikam v. Bilikam · State v. Waller · Parks v. Ford · Canary v. Wallace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(5) Statement by a Deceased, Deaf-Mute, or Incompetent Person. The statement was made by a decedent, or a deaf-mute who is now unable to testify, or a mentally incompetent person, where (a) the estate or personal representative of the decedent’s estate, or the guardian or trustee of the deaf-mute or incompetent person is a party, and (b) the statement was made before the death or the development of the deaf-mute condition or the incompetency, and (c) the statement is offered to rebut testimony by an adverse party on a matter which was within the knowledge of the decedent, deaf-mute, or incompetent person.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(B) Hearsay Exceptions. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness: U * * * “(5) Statement by a Deceased or Incompetent Person. The statement was made by a decedent * * * where (a) the estate or personal representative of the decedent’s estate * * * is a party, and (b) the statement was made before the death * * * and (c) the statement is offered to rebut testimony by an adverse party on a matter within the knowledge of the decedent * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “rules of witness competency, are procedural and do not create, modify, or abridge substantive rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.