Brown v. Ely’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Tennessee v. Garner · Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); King v. Alaska State Hous. Auth., 633 P.2d 256, 261 (Alaska 1981). . Brown v. Ely, 14 P.3d 257, 261 (Alaska 2000); Thoma v. Hickel, 947 P.2d 816, 824 (Alaska 1997); Dick Fischer Dev. No. 2, Inc. v. Dep't of Admin., 838 P.2d 263, 268 (Alaska 1992) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We have neither adopted nor rejected the Bivens approach with respect to state constitutional violations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“federal courts have not permitted the Bivens remedy if alternative remedies are available.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.