Caddy v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2006
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on King v. Smith · 162 Pa. Super. 383 - Detwiler v. Detwiler · Crammer v. Commonwealth · Krug v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“«-x- * * include reasonable standards * * * for determining eligibility for and the extent of medical assistance under the plan which (A) are consistent with the objectives of this subchapter * * § 1396a (a)(17).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although participation by the [s]tates in a[f]ederal program to provide medical assistance for the `medically needy' is optional, if the [s]tate is to remain eligible for [f]ederal funding it must comply with [f]ederal [s]tatutes and regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.