Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 SC 312 - Black v. Childs

Black v. Childs’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2009

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

201880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davoue v. Fanning · Cambridge Valley Bank v. . Delano · Birdsall v. . Russell · McCelvey v. Thomson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f there are circumstances sufficient to put a party upon the inquiry, he is held to have notice of everything which that inquiry, properly conducted would certainly disclose; but constructive notice goes no further.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.