¶1This court is satisfied with the decision of this case on the circuit^ and it is ordered, that the appeal be dismissed, and the decree affirmed.
¶2The court may hereafter add something in confirmation of the view taken by the chancellor.
14 S.C. Eq. 243
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 15, 1839
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1839-02-15
Before JOHNSTON, Chancellor, at Beaufort, January T., 1838. This case came up on an appeal from the decree of Chancellor Johnston. Held: forasmuch as it was not required'by the statute, a deed would be good without such attestation. West v. Randall, 3 Mason, 181. We think it equally certain that the same decision would have been made, if signing or sealing had been omitted.
Decided 1839-02-15
¶1This court is satisfied with the decision of this case on the circuit^ and it is ordered, that the appeal be dismissed, and the decree affirmed.
¶2The court may hereafter add something in confirmation of the view taken by the chancellor.